“So, I asked on what legal grounds did he have to kick me out. His response was, ‘Quite frankly, Alderman Ruva, for being a jerk.’ That’s no legal argument.”
Here’s a summation of the story which happened in Spring Valley and appeared in Wednesday’s Journal Star.
A Spring Valley alderman was escorted out of the City Council meeting Monday night in handcuffs after a dispute about utility taxes turned personal.
(alderman) Ruva said the city could help ease the expenses by lowering its 5 percent utility tax. He said that with the rate increases, a lower tax could still generate the same amount of revenue.
Ruva said (mayor) Narczewski did not want to hear about it and cut the discussion short. Then, after the meeting, he approached Ruva.
“He said ‘Don’t you ever do that again or I’ll kick you out of here,’ ” Ruva said.
Small town politics can be quite fun, to be sure. Unfortunately, the Journal Star doesn’t go into details as to why Mr. Ruva was removed and cuffed.
The LaSalle News Tribune does, but you have to be a subscriber to read the whole article (shhh… dont tell the PjStar). What it does let you read online still gives some fascinating insight, though.
An unplanned discussion of electricity rates led to a confrontation between a Spring Valley alderman and the city’s mayor, ending with intervention by the police chief. First Ward Alderman Rich Ruva asked the council to consider reducing the city’s utility tax to compensate for this winter’s expected increase in electricity rates.
“The majority of the people here are retired, middle class, lower class people,� Ruva said. He argued the city could reduce the tax rate and maintain the same level of income as residents’ utility bills increased, without causing those residents additional financial strain.
Mayor James Narczewski countered, “Every penny is necessary,� to pay the city’s workers, in light of rising salaries and insurance costs. City attorney Jim Andreoni also explained the city does not have enough control over its utility taxes, which are collected by Ameren. To implement Ruva’s suggestion, Andreoni said Ameren would need new software, an expense the company could refuse regardless of any ordinance the council could pass.
The exchange became more confrontational as Narczewski banged the gavel and called for an end to the discussion. “I’m very disappointed that you come to me and you ask for a few minutes, and you put everybody, all of us, in this position where we can not answer right now. We don’t know if they’re going to freeze (the electricity rate), or going to up it,� the mayor said. “If something like that is going to be discussed,� Narczewski continued, “it should probably have been brought up at a finance committee meeting when everybody could be here.�
It seems to me that Mayor Narczewski was one-upped on this and didn’t want the public to hear that the city will also benefit by Ameren’s rate increase. Additionally, the city attorney believe that the city would have to buy new software for Ameren to implement the suggestion of lowering taxes. Say that again? To lower the hidden tax that Ameren collects for the city requires new software? That’s the worst excuse for not lowering taxes that I’ve ever heard!
Food for thought: I checked my AmerenCilco bill. Here in Peoria we pay a 6% tax on the electricity portion of the bill. If the rate goes up by 50%, the city will collect 3% more revenue in 2007 vs 2006.